Legal Opinion

Bell v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 27, 1976No. 75-164PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hallett

The plaintiffs have appealed from the dismissal of their action “with prejudice” because of their refusal to comply with a court order to answer certain questions in a discovery deposition. Since the defendant had filed a counterclaim which is still pending, and the court did not make a finding that there was “no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal” (Supreme Court Rule 304(a)) we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal.

The plaintiffs Frederick and Marilyn Bell filed the present action for themselves and all other members of a class similarly situated to themselves…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Midland Electric Coal Corp. v. County of KnoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Henson v. RenshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Callen v. KoretzkyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hise v. HullAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Peter Fischer Import Motors, Inc. v. BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Branch v. European Autohaus, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of TingosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. 1350 Lake Shore Associates v. CasalinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API