State v. Tessema
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
The state moves to dismiss this appeal from a petty misdemeanor conviction as being untimely filed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
Appellant Tesfay Tessema was charged with a controlled access violation. The controlled access offense became a misdemeanor because Tessema had two prior convictions for moving traffic offenses within the last seven months. But the prosecutor and defense counsel agreed to certify the offense as a petty misdemeanor.
The case was tried to the court on December 7, 1993. On December 9, 1993, the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Village of Crosby v. StemichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. PillaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011