Legal Opinion

State v. Tessema

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1994No. C5-94-67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

The state moves to dismiss this appeal from a petty misdemeanor conviction as being untimely filed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Appellant Tesfay Tessema was charged with a controlled access violation. The controlled access offense became a misdemeanor because Tessema had two prior convictions for moving traffic offenses within the last seven months. But the prosecutor and defense counsel agreed to certify the offense as a petty misdemeanor.

The case was tried to the court on December 7, 1993. On December 9, 1993, the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Village of Crosby v. StemichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. State v. PillaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API