Legal Opinion

Stone v. . Rich

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1912Published

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. JUSTICE WALKER. This case was before use at a former term, under the (163) title of Stone Co. v. McLamb, 153 N.C. 378. We then held that Mrs. M. M. Vann, a feme covert, was liable for the debts of the firm of McLamb Co., under the statute, Revisal, sec. 2118, and that the order appointing a receiver of the partnership effects was erroneous and should be vacated, and the property, which was under mortgage to A. D. Rich, should be restored to him. The case was remanded for the settlement of the other matters involved. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lester v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Pearce v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Jos. W. Jenkins & Co. v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Vick v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Long v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API