Legal Opinion
State of Mo. Ex Rel. Nixon v. Craig
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 29, 1997No. 96-4086-CV-C-9PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARTLETT, Chief Judge.
On September 23, 1996, plaintiffs State of Missouri and the MO-ARK Association (MO-ARK) filed their First Amended Complaint (Complaint) pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that the Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) adopted an Annual Operating Plan for 1996-97 in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that the Corps took a “major…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Missouri Ex Rel. Nixon v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Missouri v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998