Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Butcher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. 37Published

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action brought to recover a commission growing out of the following paper:

“Pontiac, Mich. 1/12/21.
“Messrs. Reed and Nagel :
“I hereby agree to sell my farm of 630 acres located near Independence and Orion townships for the sum of sixty thousand ($60,000) dollars, a payment of five or ten thousand dollars down, or income property which is acceptable. I also agree to pay 5% commission. This price to remain in force for 30 days.

(Signed) “Jas. I. Butcher.”

After securing the writing, plaintiff and Reed commenced negotiations with one Houghton which resulted in an exchange of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hutton v. SherrardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Woods v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Kirby-Sorge-Felske Co. v. DotyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API