Ingram v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Tommy Ingram was found guilty on two counts of the sale of crack cocaine. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals, asserting five enumerations of error. Finding no error, we affirm.
1. In two enumerations of error, Ingram asserts the general grounds. Construed to support the jury’s verdict, the evidence shows that on two occasions Ingram sold crack cocaine to a confidential informant, who testified at trial that Ingram was the individual who sold her the cocaine. The confidential informant was checked by a police officer before and after the sale. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Quintin May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.