Legal Opinion

State v. Ruggles

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 042569MI; A127538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Ruggles, 214 Or App 612, 167 P3d 471 (2007), in which we held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to require additional chain-of-custody foundational evidence for admission of a blood alcohol testing report and that admission of that report through a witness certifying its content did not violate defendant’s rights to confront witnesses under the state and federal constitutions. Defendant asserts that we misstated his assignment of error and that his constitutional claims go to the right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RugglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Trotter v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. WidermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. WidermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. StraubCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API