Legal Opinion

Learned v. Holbrook

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Mc-Camant. Prior to March 12,1903, defendants were the owners of an undivided one-fourth interest in certain property situate in St.' Johns. Oak Park Land Company and the Estate of B. O. Severance were the owners of the remaining three-fourths interest.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Mc-Camant. Prior to March 12,1903, defendants were the owners of an undivided one-fourth interest in certain property situate in St.' Johns. Oak Park Land Company and the Estate of B. O. Severance were the owners of the remaining three-fourths interest. An agreement partitioning the property was entered into and as a part of this agreement the defendants executed and delivered the following paper: “Know all men by these presents, that we, Merrit L. Holbrook and P. S. Doernbecher, are held and firmly bound unto Oak Park Land…

1Opinion of the Court · McCamantJustice McCamant

1. The defendant Holbrook was permitted to testify over plaintiff’s objection and exception as follows:

“Q. What was the understanding among the parties, if there was any, as to the necessity of vacating streets intervening between the different parcels of that property?
“A. It was clearly understood by everybody interested in the transaction and who knew the property and knew what it was that a sawmill could not be erected there unless the streets were vacated. Nothing could be more clearly understood than that. That was discussed frequently and Mr. Powers assured me there would be no trouble…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · McCaMant.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hull v. AngusOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Holtz v. OldsOregon Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wright v. Schutt Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brecher v. LaikinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Savage v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API