Legal Opinion
Crayton v. PharMEDium Services, LLC
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided September 30, 2016No. 15-cv-2270-STA-cgcPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF RHONDA CRAYTON
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Rhonda Crayton and Sheila Reed filed this action against their former employer PharMEDium Services, LLC (“PharMEDium”), and PharMEDium employees, Keri Kjellin and John Toth,1 pur*968suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1981.2 (ECF No. 1.) Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Crayton. (ECF No. 60), Plaintiff has filed a response to the motion (ECF No. 68), Defendants have filed a reply to the response (ECF No.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Green v. The Henry County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
- Johnson v. Pennyrile Allied Community ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022