Legal Opinion

State v. Jesse Jay Weeks

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2016No. 42410PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKEY, Judge.

Jesse Jay Weeks appeals from his judgment of conviction for burglary. Weeks alleges the district court did not properly instruct the jury on the elements of theft by disposing of stolen property. Weeks further argues because there was insufficient evidence for a probable cause finding, the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information. Finally, he contends there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the conviction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The evidence presented at trial is as follows.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. DeckerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. KnutsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Joseph Roman RubioIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. Eric S. TrenkleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. Melissa Heiner aka OlinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. MitchellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API