Newhoff v. Rochester
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 194, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 5331, discharging rule for judgment on answers in case of Lewis Newhoff v. Rubin Rochester and Ettie Rochester, defendants, and Richard Building & Loan Association, Garnishee. Rule for judgment on answers in attachment execution.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 194, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 5331, discharging rule for judgment on answers in case of Lewis Newhoff v. Rubin Rochester and Ettie Rochester, defendants, and Richard Building & Loan Association, Garnishee. Rule for judgment on answers in attachment execution. Audenried, P. J., filed the following opinion: Newhoff has obtained a judgment against Rochester and Ms wife, and issued thereon an attachment execution, which has been served on the Richard Building and Loan Association. On its answers to his interrogatories…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The only assignment presented is that the court erred in discharging the appellant’s rule for judgment on the appellee’s answer to interrogatories.
The opinion filed by Audeneied, J., is a convincing answer to the appellant’s argument, and for the reasons given in discharging the rule, the judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bier v. KeerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Artisti-kote Co. v. Benefactor Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Stalwart B. & L. Ass'n v. BorbeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936