Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATION
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
*367Dissenting Opinion
Emmeet, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a finding that §11-1424, Burns’ 1942 Replacement (Supplement) (Acts 1937, ch. 21, §33, p. 64; 1943, ch. 266, §1, p. 757; 1945, ch. 93, §1, p. 209), was constitutional. Appellant’s second amended complaint charged that (1) the act denied appellant equal protection of the law, granted a special privilege and immunity to a certain class of citizens upon a purely arbitrary basis, and deprived him of property without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment, (2) that said section was in conflict with Section 21 of Article I…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.