Legal Opinion

Tyson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1993No. 49A04-9211-PC-422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

Michael G. Tyson appeals the post-conviction court's summary disposition of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

1. Did the post-conviction court err when it summarily denied Tyson’s petition for post-conviction relief based on his claim of newly discovered evidence?

2. Did the post-conviction court err when it summarily denied Tyson’s petition for post-conviction relief based on alleged violations of Brady v. Maryland?

DISCUSSION

I

Tyson asserts that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial.1 To prevail upon a claim for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  5. Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. DeBerry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Hartig v. StratmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Norris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API