Tyson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Michael G. Tyson appeals the post-conviction court's summary disposition of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUES
1. Did the post-conviction court err when it summarily denied Tyson’s petition for post-conviction relief based on his claim of newly discovered evidence?
2. Did the post-conviction court err when it summarily denied Tyson’s petition for post-conviction relief based on alleged violations of Brady v. Maryland?
DISCUSSION
I
Tyson asserts that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial.1 To prevail upon a claim for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- DeBerry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hartig v. StratmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Norris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.