Legal Opinion

DeBerry v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1995No. 32A05-9502-CR-52PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Clarence Eubank DeBerry appeals his convictions, after a trial by jury, of Receiving Stolen Auto Parts and Possession of Altered or Defaced Manufacturer's ID Number. De-Berry raises five issues, which we expand into six, none of which constitutes reversible error.

FACTS

The facts in the light most favorable to the verdict reveal that in August of 1990, a black 1987 Ford Tempo had been stolen. The Vehicle Identification Number [VIN] of this car ended in 7270.

A few weeks later, DeBerry purchased a totaled 1984 Ford Tempo. The car was not usable and had to be towed. Only…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sharp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lacy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Olson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Shaffer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Herrera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Hyppolite v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Guy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API