Legal Opinion

King v. AnMed Health

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2008No. 26457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Acting Chief Justice MOORE.

In this case, Appellants appeal the circuit court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Respondents regarding the meaning of a statute that requires hospitals to *52offer certain discounts to an insurer who provides a specific type of health insurance contract. The circuit court held that Appellants violated the statute. We disagree and reverse.

Factual/Procedural Background

Respondents1 (hereinafter “Patients”) filed an action against Appellants (hereinafter “Hospitals”) for failing to comply with S.C.Code Ann. § 38-71-120 (2002) (repealed by Act No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. Lowe's Home CentersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. In Re Hospital Pricing LitigationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Synovus Bank v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API