King v. AnMed Health
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Acting Chief Justice MOORE.
In this case, Appellants appeal the circuit court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Respondents regarding the meaning of a statute that requires hospitals to *52offer certain discounts to an insurer who provides a specific type of health insurance contract. The circuit court held that Appellants violated the statute. We disagree and reverse.
Factual/Procedural Background
Respondents1 (hereinafter “Patients”) filed an action against Appellants (hereinafter “Hospitals”) for failing to comply with S.C.Code Ann. § 38-71-120 (2002) (repealed by Act No.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clemmons v. Lowe's Home CentersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- In Re Hospital Pricing LitigationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Synovus Bank v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024