Legal Opinion

Taub v. Hale

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1966No. 29766_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

355 F.2d 201

William L. TAUB, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Randolph HALE (also known as Randolph Hale-Alcazar Theatre),

United StatesMarshals, Albert B. Gins and Melvin

J. Katz, and all other Attorneys and

Agentsfor Randolph Hale,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 203, Docket 29766.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 5, 1966.

Decided Jan. 14, 1966.

William L. Taub, pro se, and H. Hugo Perez, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Melvin J. Katz, New York City (Albert B. Gins, and Marvin L. Levitt, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before MOORE, SMITH and ANDERSON,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Taub v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Zielinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Perez v. OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Gleason v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Mohamed Ali and Nadia Ali v. A & G Company, Inc. And Saadi IbrahimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Lukensow v. Harley CarsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Charles Labs, Inc. v. BannerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API