Buckley v. R. H. Johnson & Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtTerry, J.
All of the reasons forming the basis of the-motion for a new trial are predicated upon errors the plaintiff contends are to be found embodied within my charge to the Jury. Twenty-one reasons are cited in support of the motion ; however, it is agreed that all of the reasons are to be disposed of under the five assignments heretofore stated.
I shall now discuss the first assignment; then the question concerning the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s general exception to the charge; then assignments two, three, four and five.
*555The defendant in presenting its defense produced Ralph Montoro as a witness.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wood v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Nelson v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
- Meachem v. Henry Hahn & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Spahn v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Sirmans v. PennSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Fritzinger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Cohen v. KrigsteinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.