Legal Opinion

Buckley v. R. H. Johnson & Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 17, 1942No. 109PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, J.

All of the reasons forming the basis of the-motion for a new trial are predicated upon errors the plaintiff contends are to be found embodied within my charge to the Jury. Twenty-one reasons are cited in support of the motion ; however, it is agreed that all of the reasons are to be disposed of under the five assignments heretofore stated.

I shall now discuss the first assignment; then the question concerning the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s general exception to the charge; then assignments two, three, four and five.

*555The defendant in presenting its defense produced Ralph Montoro as a witness.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Wood v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. Nelson v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. Meachem v. Henry Hahn & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Spahn v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Sirmans v. PennSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Fritzinger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Cohen v. KrigsteinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API