Legal Opinion
Arrow Equipment, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. M-R-S Manufacturing Company, a Mississippi Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1969No. 19169_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Two separate questions are presented on appeal. The first is whether a provision in a Dealership Agreement between a manufacturer (M-R-S Manufacturing Company) and its dealer (Arrow Equipment, Inc.) effectively disclaims implied warranties in a sale of tractor hauling units. The District Court found the disclaimer effective. The second question, arising from a counterclaim, is whether the monthly rental value of a wrongfully retained tractor is an appropriate measure of damages for the loss of use of the tractor. The District Court applied the monthly rental value as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Republic Pictures Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- F. O. Grey v. Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- National Dairy Products Co. v. JumperMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Stribling Bros. MacHinery Co. v. Girod Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aloyius T. And Gladys Dingman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Teamsters, Local Union No. 688 v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Arrow Equipment, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. M-R-S Manufacturing Company, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Teamsters, Local Union No. 688 v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974