Fin-Ag, Inc. v. Cimpl's, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSabers, Justice
[¶ 55.] Incredibly, Fin-Ag presents this Court with authority from a neighboring state that is virtually on point to the circumstances of this case; yet, the opinion goes out of its way at every opportunity in its analysis of the issues to arrive at the opposite conclusion of the Hufnagle case. Because I cannot agree with the opinion’s analysis and conclusions regarding FSA protection, I dissent.
[¶ 56.] In Hufnagle, the lender, Fin-Ag had a perfected security interest in Buck’s corn crops. 720 N.W.2d 579, 580 (Minn.2006). Fin-Ag also filed an effective financing statement, “which caused the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Jackson v. Canyon Place Homeowner's Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.