Legal Opinion
State v. Alberts
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 16, 1988No. 19610-3-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Gene Henry Alberts appeals, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify his probation. We affirm.
Facts
Alberts pleaded guilty to one count of third degree theft. On October 23, 1985, the trial court entered an order deferring imposition of his sentence for a period of 1 year pursuant to RCW 9.95.200. A condition of probation was that Alberts pay restitution in the amount of $657.62 to Puget Sound Power and Light Company within 9 months of sentencing.
Although not contained in the record on appeal, a probation violation report, apparently alleging nonpayment of restitution, was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MortrudWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HultmanWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Abbott v. General Accident GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Spokane v. MarquetteWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Nims v. Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. VingeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.