Legal Opinion

Mission Independent School Dist. v. Armstrong

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1920No. 154-3122PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

The suit was by George W. Armstrong, defendant in error, to recover of the Mission independent school district and P. W. Barron, tax collector, plaintiffs in error, the sum of $405.60, which he had paid under protest for taxes due the district by the Mission Cotton Oil Company, a corporation, upon personal property purchased after the levy of the tax, for the years 1912 and 1913, but which were delinquent at the time of purchase. Plaintiffs in error filed a cross-action for $150 for taxes due for 1914.

The cause was tried upon an agreed state*202ment of facts, summarized as follows: The district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. C. B. Carswell & Co. v. HabberzettleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Armstrong v. Mission Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Travis Central Appraisal District v. Signature Flight Support Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Turbeville v. GowdyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. In Re BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Monasco v. Gilmer Boating and Fishing Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  5. Black v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API