Legal Opinion
Nash v. City of Oakwood
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 30, 1981No. C-3-80-375PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS; MOTION TO COMPEL SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; MOTION TO INTERVENE OVERRULED; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause is before the Court on the following motions:(a) Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents and information described in her subpoenas duces te-cum for the November 20, 1980, and March 8, 1981, depositions, and for the April 23, 1981, class certification hearing, (doc. # # 20, 23).(b) Defendant’s motion for protective order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brisco HUFF, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N. D. CASS COMPANY OF ALABAMA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Dorothy Weathers v. Peters Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Williams v. General Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- National Organization for Women v. Sperry Rand Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Melson v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Nash v. City of OakwoodDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Reed ex rel. Burns v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Buncombe County, North Carolina v. Team Health Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.