Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 2018No. C-170593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

{¶ 1} The state of Ohio challenges the trial court's judgment that certain provisions of 2016 S.B. 331 ("S.B. 331") violated the "single-subject" rule in Article II, Section 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution. In one assignment of error, the state contends (1) that the trial court erred in holding that the provisions challenged by the city did not fall within the bill's single subject of, according to the state, creating uniform business regulations across Ohio; and (2) that the trial court inappropriately severed unchallenged provisions of S.B. 331. The state's first argument is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Bexley v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API