Legal Opinion

Estate of Hoobler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1996No. 84926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice:

The determinative issue is whether an agreement between the children of the deceased, Essie A. Hoobler (Hoobler/decedent), and her grandchildren, who were not mentioned in the deceased’s will, for division of the estate is enforceable. 1 We find that it is.

FACTS

On April 24, 1993, Hoobler died testate leaving as her only heirs the appellants, Arden K. Hoobler and Arthena Witt (collectively, children), and the appellees, Linda Hanson and Janet Denney (grandchildren), children of a predeceased daughter. Hoo-bler’s will named her son as personal representative. The will…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of EversoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of SevernsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Estate of Crump v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. ROGERS v. ESTATE OF PRATTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Schulte v. Apache Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CHESTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API