Legal Opinion

Mumaugh v. McCarley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1997No. Docket Nos. 172301, 172507 and 172522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, C.J.

These appeals arising from cases that were consolidated for trial concern an area on the western shore of Lake Huron where the lake has receded, exposing approximately two hundred feet of new land. The parties contest the boundary lines of the newly exposed area. Defendants Michael and Debra McCarley and plaintiff H. John Phelps, III, appeal as of right from the trial court’s disposition of the property in issue. Petitioner Freeda VanTol appeals as of right from the trial court’s decision that the VanTol property 1 was nonriparian. We reverse and remand.

The principal area in question in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co. v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Center Townhouse Corp. v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Stupak-Thrall v. GlickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Port Sheldon Beach Association v. Dept of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API