Sterling National Bank v. Fischer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Allen
According to the majority opinion, parties dealing with registered land or the title thereto, are not affected with notice, actual or constructive, of any unregistered interest, and a judgment creditor need not look further than the certificate of title because he is not affected by any notice, actual or constructive, of any rights not noted on the certificate of title. From that view or holding I dissent.
In Follette v. Pac. L. & P. Corp., 189 Cal. 193, 208 Pac. 295, the supreme court of California said, in effect, that it should not be held that a possessor or occupant of real property under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Peterson v. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Wedman v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Colburn v. GilcrestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.