Legal Opinion

Yarrough v. Hines

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1920No. 15868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a [judgment of tlie superior court for Spokane county, .Hum, J., entered December 26, 1919, upon tbe verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

Action by respondent to recover damages for personal injuries received while in tbe employ of tbe appellant. Tbe jury awarded respondent $5,500. Tbe trial court, at tbe time of tbe argument of appellant’s motion for new trial, intimated be would grant sucb motion unless tbe respondent would consent to a reduction of tbe verdict to $3,250. He thereafter filed *311in the canse his remittance in the sum of $2,250 and consented to a judgment in his favor of $3,250. Judgment was accordingly entered for this amount. The defendant has appealed.

The appellant seems to concede that the testimony was of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Martin v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McDonough v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Polucha v. LandesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Keown v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Adams v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Anderson v. AllisonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. McCush v. Whatcom Timber CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API