Delashmutt v. Parker Group Investments, LLC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal of an order denying third-party defendant Kameron DeLashmutt’s petition to abate and compel arbitration.1 We review for legal error, Citigroup Smith Barney v. Henderson, 241 Or App 65, 69, 250 P3d 926 (2011), and affirm.2
This dispute arises from the various parties’ roles in attempting to develop and finance a new destination resort in Central Oregon. The facts pertinent to the issue on appeal are for the most part procedural and undisputed. In June 2007, five parties, including Kameron DeLashmutt,3 entered into an “Investment Agreement” for the purpose of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Adair Homes, Inc. v. Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Citigroup Smith Barney v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Peace River Seed Co-Op, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bates v. Andaluz Waterbirth Ctr.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Thornburgh Resort Co. v. Loyal Land, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. MWH Ams., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Black Tail Dev., LLC v. Or. TV, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- DeLashmutt v. Parker Group Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.