Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Progressive Gin Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pontotoi-County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by the Waters-Pierce Oil Company, a corporation, in which the Pierce Oil Corporation, its successor, was substituted as plaintiff, against the Progressive Gin Company, which cross-petitioned. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This action was instituted by tbe plaintiff in error, Whtevs-Pierce Oil Company, a corporation, against the Progressive Gin Company, a corporation. Afterwards the Pierce Oil Corporation, as successor to the Waters-Pierce Oil Co., was substituted as 'the party plaintiff, to recover the sum of $367.20 on account of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff in error to defendant in error. The parties hereafter will be styled as they were in the trial court.
The defendant answered and filed its cross-action as follows:
“Answering affirmatively, this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- House v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Clarno v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Adalex Laboratories, Inc. v. KrawitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Eastman Nat. Bank v. HertzlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924