Legal Opinion
Bell & Pollock, P.C. v. City of Littleton
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 10, 1995No. 94CA0674PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this action concerning the collection of past due use taxes, interest, and penalties, plaintiff, Bell & Pollock, P.C., appeals the trial court’s judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendant, the City of Lit-tleton. We affirm.
Bell & Pollock is a law firm with offices located in the City of Littleton. After an audit, the city assessed Bell & Pollock $2,677.80 for unpaid use taxes, penalties, and interest.
*71Bell & Pollock protested the assessment and requested a hearing. The hearing officer upheld the assessment.
Bell & Pollock thereafter filed a complaint in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. City of Arvada v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. Moyer.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Howard Electrical & Mechanical, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- J. A. Tobin Construction Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Welby Gardens v. Adams County Bd. of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Robertson v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Robertson v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Welby Gardens v. Adams County Bd. of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003