Legal Opinion

Robertson v. City and County of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1999No. 98CA0167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge VOGT.

Plaintiffs, Lawrence M. Robertson, Jr., Sharon Deatherage, Jeffrey Hecht, and David Jewell, d/b/a/ Scotties Guns & Milita-ría, and plaintiff-intervenor, the State of Colorado ex rel. Gale A. Norton (collectively plaintiffs), appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered on remand of their declaratory judgment action against defendants, the City and County of Denver, Ari Zavaras, and Manuel Martinez. The judgment determined that a Denver ordinance banning assault weapons was not unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.

The ordinance at issue, Denver Revised Municipal Code §…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Robertson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. GrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. M.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. TRAILER HAVEN MHP, LLC v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Robertson v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API