Milliken v. Long
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 120, Oct. T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1896, No. 228, on verdict for plaintiff. Trespass for seduction of daughter.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 120, Oct. T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1896, No. 228, on verdict for plaintiff. Trespass for seduction of daughter. Before Raybubn, P. J. At the trial a number of witnesses were called on behalf of the plaintiff to prove that they were acquainted in the neighborhood in which the daughter lived from May 27, 1895; that they were acquainted with the people of that community, and that her reputation for virtue and chastity was good. The evidence was objected to by defendant as incompetent and irrelevant and not rebuttal. The defendant having…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We fail to discover error in any of the assignments. The rul ings upon offers of testimony were manifestly correct. The an swers to points were equally free from objection, and in the general charge we discover nothing that would justify a reversal. The assignments are all dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Daily v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Johnson v. LuhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Mosley v. LynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Valent v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.