Legal Opinion
Wldrnes Scty v. Norton, Gale
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 17, 2006No. 19-7062PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
The Wilderness Society (“TWS” or the “Society”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The complaint alleges that the National Park Service (“NPS” or the “Park Service”) has chronically failed to undertake various legal obligations with respect to the identification and management of “wilderness” in the National Park System. TWS seeks judicial redress to compel the agency to take actions that allegedly have been unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Center for Auto Safety & Public Citizen, Inc. v. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- River Runners for Wilderness v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.