Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Gilman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 3, 1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is a bill in equity by Charles L. Andrews and Harry B. Hodges against Sumner A. Gilman and James Coolidge, seeking first to reform a written contract between Andrews and Hodges and Coolidge, by which Andrews agreed, at the option of Coolidge, to convey to him or any person designated by him," for a price named and within a time named, the partnership property of Hodges & Coolidge, which Andrews had recently purchased of the latter. The bill also prays for the delivery and surrender of the same contract to Andrews, upon the allegation that the defendant Gilman obtained an assignment of it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Reed v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Krauss v. KuechlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Scullin v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Braman v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Debinson v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Rau v. Von ZedlitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API