Enlightened Armadillo Incorporated, et al. v. Lance Freeman
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Enlightened Armadillo Incorporated, et al., No. CV-25-02663-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Lance Freeman, 13 Defendant. 14 15 At issue is Defendant Lance Freeman’s second Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22, Mot.), 16 to which Plaintiffs Enlightened Armadillo, Inc., Mark and Ella Hrubant, and Snug Holding 17 Company LLC (“Plaintiffs”) responded (Doc. 24, Resp.), and Defendant replied (Doc. 26, 18 Reply). For the reasons below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s 19 Motion. 20 I.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.