Legal Opinion
Reebok International Ltd. v. McLaughlin
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 27, 1993No. 89-1739-GT (P)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTEMPT UPON RECONSIDERATION
GORDON THOMPSON, Jr., District Judge.
On April 26, 1993, at 10:30 a.m., REEBOK’s motion for reconsideration came on for hearing. The hearing was conducted telephonieally, and the court stated that it would file this order shortly. The Court has fully considered this matter, including review of the papers filed by the parties, the authorities cited therein, and the arguments presented.
BACKGROUND
On May 26, 1992, REEBOK’s motion for contempt came on for hearing. Following the hearing, the court issued a written opinion that held that Banque…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waffenschmidt v. MackayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Barbadillo v. GoldwynDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1930
- South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Lynch v. RankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Reebok International Ltd. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reebok International Limited v. Byron MclaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995