Legal Opinion

Jeffrey A. Walker v. David Jastremski

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 1998No. Docket 97-2721PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Jeffrey A. Walker, pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against David Jastremski, Charles Buerer, Frank Halloran, and Tjandra Tedja. Walker alleges that the defendants conspired to fabricate and distort evidence that was used to bring a criminal prosecution against him. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Nevas, J.) granted summary judgment for the defendants, ruling that Walker’s complaint was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We believe that the district court’s decision was correct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Keating v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Lounsbury v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Bornholdt v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jeffrey A. Walker v. David Jastremski, Charles Buerer, Frank Halloran, and Tedja TjandraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Malik v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. MALIK v. McGINNISCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Ted Bradford v. Joseph ScherschligtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Lewis v. State of Connecticut Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API