Legal Opinion
Fu v. Fu
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WEFING, J.A.D.
This case requires a determination of which law governs the relationships between these parties, the law of New Jersey or the law of New York. The trial court concluded that New York law applies. Because we are satisfied that the trial court erred when *438it reached this conclusion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On July 18, 1993, Xiao Su and Kuide Chen rented a car in' Lawrenceville, New Jersey from defendant Freedom River, Inc. (Freedom River). Mr. Su and Mr. Chen intended to use the car to take their families to visit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Harvey v. CrawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Haggerty v. CedenoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Schimek v. Gibb Truck Rental AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Buglioli v. Enterprise Rent-A-CarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Caggiano v. FontouraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Ryan v. LCS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.