Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Vale, Oregon Irrigation Dist.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge:
Plaintiff’s first, second and third claims arise out of damage to plaintiff’s railroad right-of-way and tracks on plaintiff’s Oregon Eastern Branch (Vale to Burns, Oregon), allegedly resulting from water escaping from defendant’s irrigation canal located on a hillside above plaintiff’s right-of-way. The first and second claims demand money damages, while the third claim seeks equitable relief against continuing trespasses.
The fourth and fifth claims are for damage to plaintiff’s railroad right-of-way and tracks between railroad mileposts 3 and 4 on its Brogan Branch…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas v. Wildish Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.