Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Vale, Oregon Irrigation Dist.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 28, 1966No. Civ. 63-399PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Plaintiff’s first, second and third claims arise out of damage to plaintiff’s railroad right-of-way and tracks on plaintiff’s Oregon Eastern Branch (Vale to Burns, Oregon), allegedly resulting from water escaping from defendant’s irrigation canal located on a hillside above plaintiff’s right-of-way. The first and second claims demand money damages, while the third claim seeks equitable relief against continuing trespasses.

The fourth and fifth claims are for damage to plaintiff’s railroad right-of-way and tracks between railroad mileposts 3 and 4 on its Brogan Branch…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas v. Wildish Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  5. McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API