Legal Opinion

Vermont Farm Machine Co. v. Marble

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 28, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The orators, on the thirtieth of March, 1880, filed an application for a patent for improvements in milk-setting apparatus, consisting, as finally amended, of nine claims, the last five of which have been allowed; the first four have been refused, because described, although not claimed, in a prior patent to the same inventors, No. 207,738, dated September 3, 1878. Prior public use to bar the patent is denied on oath by the applicants, and is not shown. The refusal rests solely, apparently, on the prior description, and Campbell v. James, 104 U. S. 356. What is said in that case, taken at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Battin v. TaggertSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. American Graphophone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
  2. Ludlum Steel Co. v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1928
  3. Benoit v. June Dairy Products Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API