Legal Opinion

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1971No. 70-207PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

R. C. 5741.01 provides, in part:

“(B) ‘Storage’ means and includes any keeping or *156retention in this state for use or other consumption in this state.
“(C) ‘Use’ means and includes the exercise of any right or power incidental to the ownership of the thing used.
“(D) ‘Purchase’ means acquired for a consideration, whether such consideration was effected by a transfer of title, or of possession, or of both, or a license to use or consume; whether such transfer was absolute or conditional, and by whatever means the same was effected; and whether the consideration was a price, rental in money, or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sundstrand Corp. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. In Re the Protest of Woods Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Federal Paper Board Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gochneaur v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API