Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Commander Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1956No. 36883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, John P. Harrison, instituted this action in the District Court of Tulsa County against Commander Mills, Inc., a corporation, to recover a sum on a quantum meruit basis for services performed under -an alleged oral contract of employment. A general demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s amended petition. The plaintiff elected to stand on his petition and judgment was rendered for defendant, and the plaintiff has perfected an appeal to this Court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the District Court.

The plaintiff alleges in his amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. Choctaw Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Davidson v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gaines v. Gaines Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Quaker Oil & Gas Co. v. Jane Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Robert A. Wachsler, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation v. Florafax International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Mohoma Oil Co. v. Ambassador Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Weston v. Acme Tool, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API