Legal Opinion
People v. District Court of the City of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 5, 1983No. Nos. 83SA284, 83SA266PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
In People v. District Court, No. 83SA284, we issued a rule to show cause why respondent district court should not be directed to vacate the sentences imposed on Clarence Burns on June 22 and June 29, 1983. In Burns v. District Court, No. 83SA266, we issued a rule to show cause why respondent district court should not b'e directed to vacate the sentence imposed on defendant on June 29,1983. We consolidated these original proceedings and now make the rule absolute in both proceedings.
I
Patti Burns and Clarence Burns (defendant) were married in 1967. One son, Darren, was born of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- District of Columbia v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re Inquiry Concerning LichtensteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. DIST. CT. OF CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983