Legal Opinion

Barkman v. City of Hackensack

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.

Assessments against the properties here involved were set aside by this court on the 28th day of May last, whereupon on the 19th of June following rules were granted at the instance of the city of Hackensack to show cause why the Supreme Court should not “ascertain and determine for what sum said properties should be assessed, and by order or decree fix the amount thereof.”

While counsel for the owners in their brief called attention to the legal status of the application, and therein argued the validity of assessment by the court at the hearing on the rule, it was stipulated that the court…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Public Service Electric and Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Beazley v. Twp. of MoorestownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Overbridge Realty Corp. v. City of HackensackBergen County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1935
  5. In re Appeal of Various Property OwnersNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API