Legal Opinion

Cox v. Ross

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1927No. 4512Published

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

A. M. Cox and James Cox filed an action against Wade H. Ross and Ruby D. Ross, husband and wife, wherein in the amended complaint they alleged that plaintiffs were in possession of four certain placer mining claims and that on or about March, 1919, an agreement was entered into between plaintiffs and defendant Wade H. Ross whereby it was mutually agreed in consideration of the plaintiffs surrendering and delivering to the defendants the possession of said placer mining claims and the improvements :

“That the said Defendants would procure a government survey of said premises above described at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Sutphen v. SutphenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Harris v. McCraryIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Shannon v. CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API