Legal Opinion

United States v. De La Paz-Rentas

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 20, 2010No. 08-1820, 08-1821, 09-1397, 09-1639PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

Before us are appeals by four defendants who were found guilty on firearms charges and, in one case, a drug charge, all of which stemmed from an undercover investigation into a weapons ring in Puerto Rico. The four defendants are Pedro Molina-Bonilla (“Molina”), Natanael De La Paz-Rentas (“De La Paz”), Victor Sanjurjo-Nuñez (“Sanjurjo”), and Waldemar Torres-González (“Torres”). Each defendant challenges his conviction on several grounds. Because several defendants challenge the sufficiency of evidence, we recite the facts as a reasonable jury could have found them. See…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. United States v. MeisesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Delgado-MarreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. CiresiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. AppolonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API