Legal Opinion

Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1994No. Civ. 940047Published

1Opinion of the Court

521 N.W.2d 632 (1994)

Judy Ann BULMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

HULSTRAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; and the State of North Dakota, Defendants and Appellees, and

Otto Moe and Robert Heim, individually and as partners doing business as Custom Tool & Repair Service, a/k/a CT & RS, and Custom Tool & Repair Service (CT & RS), Defendants.

Civ. No. 940047.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

September 13, 1994.

J.P. Dosland (argued), of Dosland, Nordhougen, Lillehaug, Johnson & Saande, Moorhead, MN., for plaintiff and appellant.

Steven A. Storslee (argued), of Fleck, Mather & Strutz, Bismarck, for defendant and…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API