Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. Reddington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1916No. 6366PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by M. C. Reddington against the Oklahoma Fire Insurance Company on an insurance policy for loss by tornado. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

The plaintiff below, M. C. Reddington, took out a joint fire and tornado policy with the Oklahoma Fire Insurance Company covering certain farm buildings, machinery, grain,-and live stock. For the premium he gave a note which, among other things, provided:

“If this note is not paid at maturity said policy shall then cease and determine and be null and void, and so remain until the same shall be fully paid and received by said company, or in case of loss under said policy, prior to the maturity of this note it shall immediately become due and payable and shall be deducted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Girard Life Insurance, Annuity & Trust Co. v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Franklin Life Insurance v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. CannedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Matlack v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Van Norman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Roth v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API