Legal Opinion
Stallings v. Bagley
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 2008No. 3:05-cr-00722PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Michael Stallings petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Stallings challenges the constitutional sufficiency of his conviction by a jury for aggravated capital murder and also challenges the constitutionality of the imposition of a sentence of death.
For the reasons set forth below, StaE-ings’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus wEl be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Court grants Stallings a writ of habeas corpus as it pertains to his claim of ineffective…
2Cases cited122 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. StovallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Dunlap v. PaskettDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022