Legal Opinion

Bedford Downs Management Corp. v. State Harness Racing Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Judge FRIEDMAN.

Bedford Downs Management Corporation (Bedford) and Valley View Downs, LP, (Valley View) petition for review of the November 3, 2005, order of the State Harness Racing Commission (Commission), which denied both of them applications for the sole remaining license to conduct harness horse race meetings at which parimutuel wagering is permitted. With respect to the denial of Bedford’s application, we vacate and remand. We affirm the denial of Valley View’s application.

Section 205(b) of the Race Horse Industry Reform Act (Reform Act), Act of December 17, 1981, P.L. 435,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Man O' War Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Muehleisen v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE HORSE RACING COM'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Bedford Downs Management Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Bedford Downs Management Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API